This Stage Utilized 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese synthetic intelligence company that establishes open-source big language models (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and funded by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the business in 2023 and works as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 model supplies reactions comparable to other modern large language models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a considerably lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of a comparable LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI models were established amid United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were intended to restrict the ability of these two nations to develop advanced AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek released its very first free chatbot app, based upon the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had gone beyond ChatGPT as the most-downloaded complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] causing Nvidia’s share price to drop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against bigger and more established competitors has actually been referred to as “overthrowing AI”, [8] constituting “the first shot at what is becoming a global AI area race”, [11] and ushering in “a brand-new age of AI brinkmanship”. [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, designs, and training details open-source, enabling its code to be easily offered for use, modification, watching, and creating files for constructing functions. [13] The company apparently strongly recruits young AI scientists from top Chinese universities, [8] and hires from outside the computer system science field to diversify its designs’ understanding and capabilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI lover Liang Wenfeng, who had actually been trading since the 2007-2008 financial crisis while going to Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he established High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on establishing and utilizing AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer specifically utilized AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative expert system chatbot open source, suggesting its code is easily readily available for usage, modification, and viewing. This includes consent to gain access to and use the source code, in addition to style documents, for developing purposes. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had actually developed a store of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are utilized to train AI [16], before the United States federal government enforced AI chip constraints on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer began a synthetic basic intelligence laboratory committed to research study establishing AI tools different from High-Flyer’s monetary organization. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the investors, the lab became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Venture capital firms hesitated in offering funding as it was unlikely that it would be able to generate an exit in a short amount of time. [15]

After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which used strong efficiency for a low rate, DeepSeek ended up being known as the catalyst for China’s AI model rate war. It was quickly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI“, and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba started to cut the price of their AI designs to contend with the business. Despite the low price charged by DeepSeek, it was rewarding compared to its competitors that were losing money. [20]

DeepSeek is focused on research study and has no detailed plans for commercialization; [20] this likewise permits its innovation to avoid the most stringent arrangements of China’s AI regulations, such as needing consumer-facing innovation to comply with the government’s controls on details. [3]

DeepSeek’s employing preferences target technical abilities instead of work experience, leading to most brand-new hires being either recent university graduates or developers whose AI professions are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the business hires people with no computer system science background to help its innovation comprehend other topics and knowledge locations, including being able to generate poetry and perform well on the notoriously hard Chinese college admissions examinations (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its very first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is available free of charge to both researchers and industrial users. The code for the model was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license contract (“DeepSeek license”) regarding “open and responsible downstream use” for the design itself. [21]

They are of the very same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed below. The series includes 8 models, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base models.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of instruction data. This produced the Instruct designs.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek launched the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B specifications in both Base and Chat kinds (no Instruct was released). It was developed to take on other LLMs offered at the time. The paper declared benchmark outcomes greater than a lot of open source LLMs at the time, specifically Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the model was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]

The architecture was essentially the very same as those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text obtained by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat versions of the 2 Base models was likewise released concurrently, gotten by training Base by supervised finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE designs (Base, Chat), each of 16B specifications (2.7 B activated per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the exact same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They declared comparable efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variant of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared professionals” that are always queried, and “routed professionals” that may not be. They found this to aid with professional balancing. In basic MoE, some experts can become excessively depended on, while other experts may be hardly ever utilized, squandering criteria. Attempting to balance the professionals so that they are equally utilized then triggers experts to duplicate the same capacity. They proposed the shared professionals to find out core capacities that are often used, and let the routed professionals to find out the peripheral capabilities that are hardly ever utilized. [28]

In April 2024, they released 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base design.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K mathematics problems and their tool-use-integrated step-by-step options. This produced the Instruct model.
Reinforcement learning (RL): The reward model was a process benefit model (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd method. [30] This reward design was then used to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics concerns “related to GSM8K and MATH”. The reward design was continuously upgraded throughout training to prevent benefit hacking. This resulted in the RL model.

V2

In May 2024, they launched the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 designs, 2 base models (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 larger designs were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K utilizing YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M instances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for safety. This led to DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not released.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in 2 stages. The first stage was trained to resolve mathematics and coding problems. This stage utilized 1 benefit model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for mathematics). The 2nd stage was trained to be practical, safe, and follow rules. This stage utilized 3 benefit models. The helpfulness and security reward models were trained on human preference information. The rule-based benefit design was manually set. All trained benefit designs were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the released version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They went with 2-staged RL, since they discovered that RL on thinking information had “unique qualities” different from RL on basic information. For example, RL on reasoning could improve over more training steps. [31]

The 2 V2-Lite models were smaller, and skilled similarly, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat just underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to assist “additional research and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]

Architecturally, the V2 models were significantly customized from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the standard attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head hidden attention (MLA), and utilized the mix of professionals (MoE) alternative previously published in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was more affordable than its peers with a price of 2 RMB for every million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they launched 4 designs in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base designs were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained further for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base models.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to produce 20K code-related and 30K math-related guideline information, then combined with a guideline dataset of 300M tokens. This was used for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The reward for mathematics issues was calculated by comparing to the ground-truth label. The benefit for code issues was generated by a reward design trained to forecast whether a program would pass the unit tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and updated in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they released a base model DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat design DeepSeek-V3. The model architecture is essentially the very same as V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mainly English and Chinese. It contained a greater ratio of mathematics and programs than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length two times, from 4K to 32K and then to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (mathematics, programs, logic) and non-reasoning (creative writing, roleplay, basic question answering) data. Reasoning data was produced by “professional designs”. Non-reasoning information was created by DeepSeek-V2.5 and inspected by people. – The “expert designs” were trained by starting with an unspecified base design, then SFT on both information, and synthetic data created by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system timely asked the R1 to show and verify throughout thinking. Then the professional models were RL utilizing an undefined benefit function.
– Each expert model was trained to generate simply synthetic thinking data in one specific domain (mathematics, shows, reasoning).
– Expert models were utilized, instead of R1 itself, given that the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, bad formatting, and extreme length”.

4. Model-based reward models were made by starting with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human choice data including both last reward and chain-of-thought leading to the last reward. The benefit model produced reward signals for both questions with unbiased but free-form responses, and concerns without objective answers (such as innovative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both reward models and rule-based reward. The rule-based reward was computed for mathematics problems with a last response (put in a box), and for programming issues by unit tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek team performed extensive low-level engineering to achieve performance. They used mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit drifting point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the standard 32-bit, needing unique GEMM regimens to accumulate precisely. They used a customized 12-bit float (E5M6) for just the inputs to the direct layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states were in 16-bit (BF16). They minimized the interaction latency by overlapping thoroughly computation and interaction, such as committing 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU communication. They decreased interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the exact device each professional was on in order to avoid certain machines being queried regularly than the others, including auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing strategies. [37]

After training, it was deployed on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are linked by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests reveal that DeepSeek-V3 exceeded Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview became accessible by means of DeepSeek’s API, along with through a chat user interface after logging in. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for logical inference, mathematical thinking, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek claimed that it surpassed efficiency of OpenAI o1 on standards such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal stated when it used 15 problems from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached a solution quicker than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The company also launched some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” designs, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on artificial data created by R1. [47]

A discussion between User and Assistant. The user asks a concern, and the Assistant fixes it. The assistant initially thinks of the reasoning process in the mind and after that offers the user with the response. The reasoning procedure and response are confined within and tags, respectively, i.e., reasoning process here address here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained solely using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous variations, they used no model-based reward. All reward functions were rule-based, “generally” of two types (other types were not defined): accuracy rewards and format benefits. Accuracy reward was checking whether a boxed response is correct (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for shows). Format reward was inspecting whether the design puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has problems with readability and blending languages, R1 was trained to attend to these concerns and further enhance thinking: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” data all with the standard format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the exact same RL procedure as R1-Zero, but also with a “language consistency reward” to motivate it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal design not released.
3. Synthesize 600K reasoning data from the internal model, with rejection tasting (i.e. if the produced reasoning had a wrong final answer, then it is gotten rid of). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, factual QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K artificial data for 2 epochs.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based benefit (for reasoning jobs) and model-based reward (for non-reasoning jobs, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K data synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar way as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and responses

DeepSeek released its AI Assistant, which utilizes the V3 design as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had exceeded ChatGPT as the highest-rated complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot apparently responds to concerns, solves logic problems and composes computer system programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests utilized by American AI business. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 uses considerably less resources compared to its peers; for instance, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as many as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek declares to require only about 2,000 GPUs, namely the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at a cost of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech huge Meta invested constructing its most current AI technology. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at fairly minimal cost has actually been acknowledged as possibly challenging the global supremacy of American AI designs. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik moment” for American AI. [49] [50] The efficiency of its R1 model was apparently “on par with” one of OpenAI’s most current designs when utilized for tasks such as mathematics, coding, and natural language reasoning; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley investor Marc Andreessen likewise described R1 as “AI’s Sputnik moment”. [51]

DeepSeek’s founder, Liang Wenfeng has actually been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media widely applauded DeepSeek as a nationwide property. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with professionals and asked him to supply opinions and tips on a draft for comments of the annual 2024 government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of restricted resources has actually highlighted potential limitations of United States sanctions on China’s AI development, which consist of export restrictions on sophisticated AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the business’s AI designs subsequently “triggered market chaos” [57] and triggered shares in significant international technology companies to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech companies also sank, consisting of Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A global selloff of innovation stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 model, had caused tape-record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and hardware business; [59] by 28 January 2025, an overall of $1 trillion of value was rubbed out American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had combined reactions to DeepSeek’s success and performance. [60] Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are involved in the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to develop American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “incredibly impressive”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a favorable development. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, consisting of Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk revealed uncertainty of the app’s efficiency or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various business, including Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to utilize the design in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek limited its new user registration to phone numbers from mainland China, email addresses, or Google account logins, following a “large-scale” cyberattack disrupted the proper performance of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have observed that the official application shows interface (API) version of R1, which ranges from servers found in China, uses censorship mechanisms for topics that are considered politically delicate for the government of China. For instance, the design refuses to address concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, comparisons between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI may at first generate an answer, however then deletes it soon later on and replaces it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my current scope. Let’s speak about something else.” [72] The integrated censorship mechanisms and constraints can just be gotten rid of to a restricted level in the open-source variation of the R1 model. If the “core socialist values” defined by the Chinese Internet regulative authorities are touched upon, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are ended. [74] When evaluated by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 explained Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s territory,” and stated: “We firmly oppose any form of ‘Taiwan independence’ separatist activities and are devoted to achieving the total reunification of the motherland through tranquil methods.” [75] In January 2025, Western scientists had the ability to fool DeepSeek into providing particular responses to a few of these topics by asking for in its response to swap certain letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and personal privacy

Some experts fear that the government of China could use the AI system for foreign influence operations, spreading disinformation, security and the advancement of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s privacy terms and conditions state “We store the details we collect in safe servers located in the People’s Republic of China … We may collect your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other material that you offer to our design and Services”. Although the information storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s privacy policy, [79] a Wired post reports this as security issues. [80] In reaction, the Italian information protection authority is seeking additional info on DeepSeek’s collection and usage of individual information, and the United States National Security Council revealed that it had actually started a national security review. [81] [82] Taiwan’s federal government banned making use of DeepSeek at government ministries on security grounds and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a query into DeepSeek’s usage of personal info. [83]

Artificial intelligence market in China.

Notes

^ a b c The variety of heads does not equal the variety of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design named DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was launched as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed selecting “Deep Think enabled”, and every user could utilize it just 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s low-cost, open AI design DeepSeek thrills scientists”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic exposes an AI world prepared to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Competing With Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s cheaper designs and weaker chips cast doubt on trillions in AI infrastructure spending”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports might hit India’s AI aspirations”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia examination signals broadening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dethrones ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you need to understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to plunge?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares tumble as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a top Chinese AI design overcame US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the original on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is changing how AI models are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI leader”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at primary · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at main”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at primary”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s new AI model exceeds Meta, OpenAI products”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, outperforms Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s new AI model appears to be one of the best ‘open’ oppositions yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: releasing supercharged thinking power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s first reasoning model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, however China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI startup DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the initial on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik moment’: $1tn cleaned off US stocks after Chinese company reveals AI chatbot” – via The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI start-up that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek postures a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock thrashing, Graphika says”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 ， 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI company’s AI model breakthrough highlights limitations of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot sparks US market turmoil, cleaning $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek triggers worldwide AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ but Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “incredibly outstanding”: “We ought to take the developments out of China very, extremely seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek design ‘outstanding'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek advancement “positive””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – by means of NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s disturbance”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘concerns’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests enormous Nvidia GPU facilities”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS customers, including Stripe and Toyota, are pestering the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek struck with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app stores”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek momentarily restricted new sign-ups, citing ‘massive destructive attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has actually sparked a $1 trillion panic – and it does not appreciate complimentary speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We attempted out DeepSeek. It worked well, up until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a global AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the increase of turmoil”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, giving the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI poses formidable cyber, data privacy risks”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts prompt care over usage of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has actually painted a big TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator seeks info from DeepSeek on information defense”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House assesses impact of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, official says”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.