Generative Expert System

Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, particularly large language designs (LLMs), made it possible for an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These consist of chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image expert system image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu along with various smaller sized companies have established generative AI designs. [7] [13] [14]

Generative AI has utilizes across a wide variety of industries, including software development, health care, financing, home entertainment, client service, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, writing, [17] style, [18] and item design. [19] However, concerns have actually been raised about the potential misuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, the usage of phony news or deepfakes to trick or manipulate people, and the mass replacement of human jobs. [20] [21] Copyright law concerns likewise exist around generative models that are trained on and imitate copyrighted masterpieces. [22]

Early history

Since its creation, researchers in the field have raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the repercussions of developing synthetic beings with human-like intelligence; these concerns have previously been explored by misconception, fiction and viewpoint because antiquity. [23] The concept of automated art dates back at least to the robot of ancient Greek civilization, where creators such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were referred to as having actually designed makers efficient in writing text, creating noises, and playing music. [24] [25] The custom of imaginative automations has actually flourished throughout history, exemplified by Maillardet’s automaton created in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have actually long been utilized to design natural languages considering that their advancement by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov released his first paper on the subject in 1906, [27] [28] and evaluated the pattern of vowels and consonants in the unique Eugeny Onegin using Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is discovered on a text corpus, it can then be utilized as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]

Academic expert system

The scholastic discipline of artificial intelligence was established at a research study workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has actually experienced several waves of advancement and optimism in the years considering that. [31] Artificial Intelligence research study started in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and scientists have utilized synthetic intelligence to create creative works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was producing and displaying generative AI works produced by AARON, the computer system program Cohen created to generate paintings. [32]

The terms generative AI preparation or generative planning were used in the 1980s and 1990s to describe AI planning systems, specifically computer-aided process preparation, utilized to produce sequences of actions to reach a specified objective. [33] [34] Generative AI planning systems used symbolic AI methods such as state area search and constraint complete satisfaction and were a “reasonably fully grown” technology by the early 1990s. They were utilized to generate crisis action prepare for military use, [35] procedure prepare for manufacturing [33] and choice plans such as in model autonomous spacecraft. [36]

Generative neural webs (2014-2019)

Since its inception, the field of device knowing utilized both discriminative designs and generative models, to model and forecast data. Beginning in the late 2000s, the introduction of deep knowing drove development and research in image category, speech recognition, natural language processing and other jobs. Neural networks in this period were typically trained as discriminative models, due to the difficulty of generative modeling. [37]

In 2014, improvements such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the very first useful deep neural networks capable of finding out generative models, as opposed to discriminative ones, for intricate data such as images. These deep generative designs were the first to output not only class labels for images but likewise whole images.

In 2017, the Transformer network allowed improvements in generative models compared to older Long-Short Term Memory models, [38] leading to the first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), referred to as GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which showed the ability to generalize not being watched to several tasks as a Structure design. [40]

The new generative designs introduced throughout this duration allowed for big neural networks to be trained using without supervision learning or semi-supervised learning, rather than the supervised learning typical of discriminative designs. Unsupervised learning got rid of the requirement for people to by hand label information, permitting for larger networks to be trained. [41]

Generative AI boom (2020-)

In March 2020, 15. ai, produced by a confidential MIT scientist, was a totally free web application that might produce convincing character voices using very little training information. [42] The platform is credited as the first mainstream service to promote AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content creation, influencing subsequent advancements in voice AI innovation. [43] [44]

In 2021, the emergence of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative design, marked an advance in AI-generated imagery. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which further democratized access to premium synthetic intelligence art creation from natural language prompts. [46] These systems showed extraordinary capabilities in producing photorealistic images, art work, and creates based upon text descriptions, resulting in widespread adoption among artists, designers, and the public.

In late 2022, the public release of ChatGPT reinvented the accessibility and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based tasks. [47] The system’s ability to take part in natural discussions, produce imaginative content, help with coding, and perform different analytical jobs captured worldwide attention and triggered widespread discussion about AI’s possible effect on work, education, and creativity. [48]

In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another dive in generative AI abilities. A group from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it “could fairly be considered as an early (yet still incomplete) variation of a synthetic general intelligence (AGI) system.” [49] However, this assessment was objected to by other scholars who preserved that generative AI remained “still far from reaching the standard of ‘general human intelligence'” as of 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta launched ImageBind, an AI design combining numerous techniques consisting of text, images, video, thermal data, 3D data, audio, and movement, paving the way for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]

In December 2023, Google revealed Gemini, a multimodal AI model available in four variations: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The company integrated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and revealed plans for “Bard Advanced” powered by the bigger Gemini Ultra model. [53] In February 2024, Google unified Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand, introducing a mobile app on Android and integrating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]

In March 2024, Anthropic launched the Claude 3 family of large language designs, including Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The designs showed substantial improvements in abilities throughout different standards, with Claude 3 Opus notably outperforming leading designs from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic released Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which showed enhanced efficiency compared to the bigger Claude 3 Opus, particularly in locations such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]

According to a study by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has actually emerged as a worldwide leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese respondents using the technology, surpassing both the international average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This management is additional evidenced by China’s intellectual home advancements in the field, with a UN report revealing that Chinese entities filed over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, substantially going beyond the United States in patent applications. [58]

Modalities

A generative AI system is constructed by applying not being watched artificial intelligence (invoking for example neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised machine finding out trained on a dataset. The capabilities of a generative AI system depend on the technique or kind of the information set used. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take just one type of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one type of input. [59] For example, one version of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]

Text

Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens include GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of large language models). They can natural language processing, device translation, and natural language generation and can be used as structure designs for other tasks. [62] Data sets include BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).

Code

In addition to natural language text, large language designs can be trained on shows language text, allowing them to create source code for new computer system programs. [63] Examples consist of OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]

Images

Producing premium visual art is a prominent application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions include Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Artificial intelligence art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are commonly used for text-to-image generation and neural style transfer. [66] Datasets consist of LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer vision and image processing).

Audio

Generative AI can likewise be trained extensively on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech abilities. An early pioneer in this field was 15. ai, released in March 2020, which showed the ability to clone character voices utilizing as little as 15 seconds of training information. [67] The website got widespread attention for its ability to create mentally expressive speech for different fictional characters, though it was later on taken offline in 2022 due to copyright concerns. [68] [69] [70] Commercial alternatives subsequently emerged, consisting of ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]

Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can also be trained on the audio waveforms of taped music in addition to text annotations, in order to generate brand-new musical samples based upon text descriptions such as a calming violin melody backed by a distorted guitar riff.

Music

Audio deepfakes of lyrics have actually been created, like the tune Savages, which utilized AI to simulate rapper Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted but their voices aren’t protected from regenerative AI yet, raising a dispute about whether artists should get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]

Many AI music generators have actually been produced that can be generated using a text phrase, genre alternatives, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]

Video

Generative AI trained on annotated video can generate temporally-coherent, in-depth and photorealistic video. Examples consist of Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]

Actions

Generative AI can also be trained on the movements of a robotic system to produce brand-new trajectories for movement preparation or navigation. For example, UniPi from Google Research utilizes triggers like “choose up blue bowl” or “wipe plate with yellow sponge” to control motions of a robotic arm. [78] Multimodal “vision-language-action” designs such as Google’s RT-2 can carry out rudimentary thinking in action to user triggers and visual input, such as getting a toy dinosaur when provided the prompt pick up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other objects. [79]

3D modeling

Artificially intelligent computer-aided design (CAD) can use text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries could also be developed utilizing connected open data of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are used as tools to assist streamline workflow. [82]

Software and hardware

Generative AI designs are used to power chatbot items such as ChatGPT, shows tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image items such as Midjourney, and text-to-video items such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI features have been incorporated into a range of existing commercially offered products such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI designs are also readily available as open-source software application, consisting of Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language design.

Smaller generative AI designs with as much as a couple of billion parameters can operate on smartphones, ingrained gadgets, and computers. For instance, LLaMA-7B (a variation with 7 billion parameters) can operate on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one version of Stable Diffusion can operate on an iPhone 11. [90]

Larger models with 10s of billions of specifications can run on laptop or desktop. To attain an acceptable speed, designs of this size might require accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine consisted of in Apple silicon items. For example, the 65 billion specification variation of LLaMA can be set up to work on a desktop PC. [91]

The benefits of running generative AI locally include security of privacy and intellectual residential or commercial property, and avoidance of rate limiting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in particular focuses on utilizing consumer-grade gaming graphics cards [92] through such strategies as compression. That online forum is among only two sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language design criteria. [93] Yann LeCun has actually promoted open-source designs for their value to vertical applications [94] and for enhancing AI safety. [95]

Language designs with numerous billions of criteria, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, usually operate on datacenter computers geared up with ranges of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These large designs are normally accessed as cloud services online.

In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China enforced limitations on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips utilized for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were established to fulfill the requirements of the sanctions.

There is free software application on the marketplace capable of recognizing text generated by generative synthetic intelligence (such as GPTZero), along with images, audio or video originating from it. [99] Potential mitigation techniques for discovering generative AI content consist of digital watermarking, content authentication, information retrieval, and machine knowing classifier models. [100] Despite claims of precision, both complimentary and paid AI text detectors have actually frequently produced incorrect positives, erroneously accusing trainees of sending AI-generated work. [101] [102]

Law and guideline

In the United States, a group of companies including OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary agreement with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated material. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 used the Defense Production Act to require all US business to report details to the federal government when training certain high-impact AI designs. [104] [105]

In the European Union, the proposed Artificial Intelligence Act consists of requirements to disclose copyrighted product used to train generative AI systems, and to label any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]

In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services introduced by the Cyberspace Administration of China controls any public-facing generative AI. It consists of requirements to watermark created images or videos, regulations on training data and label quality, constraints on personal information collection, and a guideline that generative AI need to “abide by socialist core values”. [108] [109]

Copyright

Training with copyrighted content

Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on big, publicly offered datasets that include copyrighted works. AI designers have argued that such training is safeguarded under fair use, while copyright holders have actually argued that it infringes their rights. [110]

Proponents of fair use training have argued that it is a transformative usage and does not include making copies of copyrighted works readily available to the public. [110] Critics have actually argued that image generators such as Midjourney can create nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] and that generative AI programs contend with the content they are trained on. [112]

As of 2024, a number of lawsuits related to the usage of copyrighted material in training are ongoing. Getty Images has sued Stability AI over the usage of its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York City Times have taken legal action against Microsoft and OpenAI over the usage of their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]

Copyright of AI-generated material

A different question is whether AI-generated works can qualify for copyright security. The United States Copyright Office has actually ruled that works developed by artificial intelligence without any human input can not be copyrighted, due to the fact that they do not have human authorship. [116] However, the office has actually also begun taking public input to figure out if these rules require to be fine-tuned for generative AI. [117]

Concerns

The development of generative AI has actually raised concerns from governments, services, and people, resulting in demonstrations, legal actions, calls to stop briefly AI experiments, and actions by numerous governments. In a July 2023 rundown of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres stated “Generative AI has huge potential for excellent and evil at scale”, that AI may “turbocharge global advancement” and contribute between $10 and $15 trillion to the international economy by 2030, but that its destructive use “might cause horrific levels of death and damage, extensive injury, and deep psychological damage on an inconceivable scale”. [118]

Job losses

From the early days of the advancement of AI, there have actually been arguments advanced by ELIZA developer Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether jobs that can be done by computers actually need to be done by them, offered the distinction in between computers and people, and between quantitative calculations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has led to 70% of the jobs for computer game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, developments in generative AI contributed to the 2023 Hollywood labor conflicts. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, stated that “synthetic intelligence presents an existential risk to creative occupations” throughout the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has been seen as a possible obstacle to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]

The intersection of AI and employment concerns amongst underrepresented groups internationally stays a critical facet. While AI promises effectiveness enhancements and ability acquisition, issues about job displacement and biased recruiting processes continue among these groups, as laid out in studies by Fast Company. To utilize AI for a more fair society, proactive actions incorporate mitigating biases, advocating openness, respecting personal privacy and permission, and welcoming diverse groups and ethical factors to consider. Strategies involve redirecting policy emphasis on policy, inclusive style, and education’s potential for individualized teaching to take full advantage of advantages while decreasing damages. [126]

Racial and gender bias

Generative AI designs can show and enhance any cultural predisposition present in the underlying information. For example, a language model may presume that medical professionals and judges are male, which secretaries or nurses are female, if those predispositions prevail in the training information. [127] Similarly, an image design triggered with the text “a picture of a CEO” might disproportionately produce images of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially biased information set. A number of approaches for reducing predisposition have actually been attempted, such as altering input prompts [129] and reweighting training information. [130]

Deepfakes

Deepfakes (a portmanteau of “deep learning” and “phony” [131] are AI-generated media that take a person in an existing image or video and replace them with somebody else’s similarity using artificial neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have garnered widespread attention and concerns for their uses in deepfake celeb pornographic videos, vengeance porn, fake news, scams, health disinformation, financial scams, and concealed foreign election interference. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has actually elicited actions from both industry and federal government to discover and restrict their usage. [140] [141]

In July 2023, the fact-checking business Logically found that the popular generative AI models Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce possible disinformation images when triggered to do so, such as images of electoral scams in the United States and Muslim women supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]

In April 2024, a paper proposed to utilize blockchain (dispersed journal innovation) to promote “transparency, verifiability, and decentralization in AI development and use”. [144]

Audio deepfakes

Instances of users abusing software application to create controversial statements in the vocal design of celebs, public authorities, and other popular people have raised ethical concerns over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In action, companies such as ElevenLabs have actually stated that they would work on mitigating possible abuse through safeguards and identity verification. [151]

Concerns and fandoms have spawned from AI-generated music. The exact same software application utilized to clone voices has been used on famous artists’ voices to create tunes that imitate their voices, gaining both remarkable popularity and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar methods have actually also been utilized to develop improved quality or full-length versions of tunes that have actually been leaked or have yet to be launched. [155]

Generative AI has actually likewise been utilized to create new digital artist personalities, with a few of these getting sufficient attention to get record offers at significant labels. [156] The developers of these virtual artists have actually likewise faced their reasonable share of criticism for their personified programs, consisting of backlash for “dehumanizing” an artform, and likewise creating artists which develop unrealistic or immoral attract their audiences. [157]

Cybercrime

Generative AI‘s capability to produce realistic fake content has actually been made use of in various types of cybercrime, including phishing scams. [158] Deepfake video and audio have been used to produce disinformation and fraud. In 2020, previous Google click fraud czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that once deepfake videos become perfectly realistic, they would stop appearing exceptional to viewers, possibly resulting in uncritical acceptance of incorrect info. [159] Additionally, large language designs and other kinds of text-generation AI have actually been used to produce fake evaluations of e-commerce websites to increase ratings. [160] Cybercriminals have produced big language designs focused on fraud, consisting of WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]

A 2023 study showed that generative AI can be vulnerable to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and timely injection attacks, enabling aggressors to acquire assist with hazardous requests, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other researchers have actually demonstrated that open-source models can be fine-tuned to eliminate their security limitations at low expense. [163]

Reliance on industry giants

Training frontier AI designs requires an enormous quantity of calculating power. Usually just Big Tech companies have the monetary resources to make such financial investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI wind up purchasing access to data centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]

Energy and environment

Scientists and journalists have expressed issues about the ecological effect that the development and release of generative designs are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] big amounts of freshwater utilized for information centers, [168] [169] and high quantities of electrical power use. [170] [166] [171] There is also issue that these impacts may increase as these designs are incorporated into commonly used online search engine such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications end up being more popular; [170] [169] and as designs require to be re-trained. [170]

Proposed mitigation techniques consist of factoring potential ecological costs prior to design development or information collection, [165] increasing performance of data centers to lower electricity/energy usage, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] constructing more effective device learning designs, [168] [166] [169] decreasing the number of times that models need to be re-trained, [167] developing a government-directed structure for auditing the ecological impact of these designs, [168] [167] managing for transparency of these designs, [167] managing their energy and water use, [168] encouraging scientists to release data on their models’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the number of subject professionals who understand both machine knowing and environment science. [167]

Content quality

The New york city Times specifies slop as comparable to spam: “substandard or undesirable A.I. content in social networks, art, books and … in search engine result.” [172] Journalists have expressed issues about the scale of low-quality created material with respect to social networks content small amounts, [173] the financial rewards from social networks business to spread out such material, [173] [174] incorrect political messaging, [174] spamming of clinical research paper submissions, [175] increased effort and time to discover higher quality or preferred material on the Internet, [176] the indexing of produced material by search engines, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]

A paper released by scientists at Amazon Web Services AI Labs discovered that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a picture of websites, were maker equated. Many of these automated translations were seen as lower quality, especially for sentences that were equated throughout at least 3 languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were translated across more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]

In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that calculated word frequencies based upon text from the Internet, announced that she had stopped upgrading the data for a number of reasons: high costs for getting information from Reddit and Twitter, excessive concentrate on generative AI compared to other methods in the natural language processing neighborhood, and that “generative AI has polluted the data”. [181]

The adoption of generative AI tools caused an explosion of AI-generated content throughout multiple domains. A study from University College London estimated that in 2023, more than 60,000 scholarly articles-over 1% of all publications-were likely written with LLM assistance. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, around 17.5% of freshly released computer technology papers and 16.9% of peer review text now include content produced by LLMs. [183]

Visual material follows a similar pattern. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is estimated that approximately 34 million images have actually been created daily. As of August 2023, more than 15 billion images had been generated utilizing text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these created by designs based upon Stable Diffusion. [184]

If AI-generated content is included in brand-new data crawls from the Internet for additional training of AI designs, problems in the resulting designs may take place. [185] Training an AI model solely on the output of another AI design produces a lower-quality design. Repeating this process, where each new model is trained on the previous model’s output, leads to progressive degradation and ultimately leads to a “model collapse” after multiple versions. [186] Tests have actually been conducted with pattern recognition of handwritten letters and with images of human faces. [187] As a repercussion, the value of information collected from real human interactions with systems might end up being progressively important in the existence of LLM-generated material in information crawled from the Internet.

On the other side, synthetic information is frequently used as an alternative to data produced by real-world occasions. Such information can be released to validate mathematical designs and to train artificial intelligence models while maintaining user privacy, [188] consisting of for structured data. [189] The approach is not limited to text generation; image generation has been utilized to train computer system vision designs. [190]

Misuse in journalism

In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had actually been utilizing a concealed internal AI tool to compose a minimum of 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET published corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]

In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle released a fake AI-generated interview with former racing driver Michael Schumacher, who had not made any public appearances given that 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a skiing accident. The story consisted of two possible disclosures: the cover included the line “stealthily real”, and the interview consisted of an acknowledgment at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired soon thereafter amidst the controversy. [192]

Other outlets that have actually published articles whose content and/or byline have been validated or believed to be developed by generative AI models – often with false content, errors, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI usage – consist of:

– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]

In May 2024, Futurism kept in mind that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had actually used generative AI to produce short articles for a lot of the aforementioned outlets, appeared to show that they “had actually produced tens of thousands of short articles for more than 150 publishers.” [201]

News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have presented news with anchors based on Generative AI designs, prompting issues about task losses for human anchors and audience rely on news that has actually traditionally been influenced by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, material developers or social networks influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically produced anchors have actually likewise been used by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]

In 2023, Google apparently pitched a tool to news outlets that declared to “produce news stories” based upon input information supplied, such as “information of present occasions”. Some news company executives who saw the pitch described it as” [taking] for granted the effort that entered into producing accurate and artful newspaper article.” [224]

In February 2024, Google launched a program to pay little publishers to write 3 posts per day utilizing a beta generative AI model. The program does not require the understanding or approval of the websites that the publishers are using as sources, nor does it need the released posts to be identified as being created or helped by these models. [225]

Many defunct news sites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blog sites (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have gone through cybersquatting, with posts created by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]

United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have actually expressed concern that generative AI could have a harmful effect on local news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to fund regional news outlets for explore generative AI, with Axios keeping in mind the possibility of generative AI business developing a dependency for these news outlets. [235]

Meta AI, a chatbot based on Llama 3 which summarizes newspaper article, was kept in mind by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to potentially additional decrease the traffic of online news outlets. [236]

In response to possible pitfalls around the use and abuse of generative AI in journalism and stress over decreasing audience trust, outlets all over the world, including publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have published standards around how they prepare to utilize and not utilize AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]

In June 2024, Reuters Institute published their Digital New Report for 2024. In a survey of people in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are uncomfortable with news produced by “mainly AI with some human oversight”, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfortable. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfortable with news produced by “primarily human with some assistance from AI”. The results of international surveys reported that people were more uncomfortable with news topics consisting of politics (46%), crime (43%), and local news (37%) produced by AI than other news subjects. [241]

Computer programming website

Technology website

Artificial general intelligence – Type of AI with wide-ranging capabilities
Artificial creativity – Artificial simulation of human creativity
Expert system art – Visual media created with AI
Artificial life – Discipline
Chatbot – Program that simulates conversation
Computational creativity – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep learning technique
Generative pre-trained transformer – Type of large language model
Large language model – Type of artificial intelligence design
Music and expert system – Usage of expert system to generate music
Generative AI porn – Explicit product produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which information is created algorithmically rather than by hand
Retrieval-augmented generation – Type of info retrieval utilizing LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term utilized in artificial intelligence

References

^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). “Executive Order N-12-23” (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). “Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework”. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ “What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?”. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ “What is generative AI?”. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). “Artificial Intelligence Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). “Generative designs”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). “Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). “A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). “LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications”. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). “A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ “The race of the AI laboratories warms up”. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). “Google Cloud brings generative AI to designers, companies, and governments”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the initial on March 28, 2024, recovered January 21, 2024
^ “Don’t fear an AI-induced tasks apocalypse just yet”. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). “In Hollywood writers’ battle against AI, humans win (for now)”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. “Generative AI: Unlocking the future of style”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). “Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI”. techpolicy.press. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). “Misinformation reloaded? Fears about the impact of generative AI on false information are overblown”. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ “New AI systems clash with copyright law”. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robot from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the original on January 13, 2018, obtained October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), “The Automata in the Byzantine “Throne of Solomon””, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). “Maillardet’s Automaton”. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the initial on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). “First Links in the Markov Chain”. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). “The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications”. Artificial intelligence. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Search for Artificial Intelligence. New York, New York: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). “A Short History of Generative AI” (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Much Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the initial on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). “Computer assisted process preparation: the advanced survey”. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). “Automated planning and scheduling for goal-based self-governing spacecraft”. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Flying Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). A Self-governing Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a standard generative AI coordinator based upon the HSTS preparation structure (Muscettola, 1994), and our control component is a standard spacecraft attitude control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We also include an architectural part clearly committed to world modeling (the mode identifier), and distinguish between control and tracking.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Machine learning: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). “A Detailed Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT”. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ “finetune-transformer-lm”. GitHub. Archived from the original on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). “Language designs are without supervision multitask learners” (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). “Improving language understanding with unsupervised learning”. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the original on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have actually been around in some form given that ’15. ai’ released in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E produces plausible pictures of literally anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it replace human beings?”. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). “How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an “anything tool””. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4”. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). “ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Expert System in Research and Science”. Journal of Information Technology. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ “Meta open-sources multisensory AI design that integrates six kinds of data”. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). “Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). “Google launches Gemini-an effective AI design it says can surpass GPT-4”. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). “Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant”. The New York City Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ “Introducing the next generation of Claude”. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). “Anthropic unveils Claude 3, surpassing GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests”. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). “Anthropic has a quick brand-new AI model – and a creative new way to communicate with chatbots”. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). “China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, survey shows”. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ “A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4”. March 21, 2023. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ “Explainer: What is Generative AI, the innovation behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?”. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). “Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Wished to Be Alive.'”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). “On the opportunities and dangers of structure designs”. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code”. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ “Purchasing Cursor”. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex “Sandy”; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). “Art and the science of generative AI”. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). “Zero-shot text-to-image generation”. International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the original on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). “Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App”. Game Informer. Archived from the original on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15. ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the original on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please note that only English voices are available.; Another major feature of 15. ai is its rich psychological expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). “A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). “MusicLM: Generating Music From Text”. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). “Meta in June said that it used 20,000 hours of licensed music to train MusicGen, which included 10,000 “high-quality” licensed music tracks. At the time, Meta’s researchers described in a paper the ethical challenges that they experienced around the advancement of generative AI models like MusicGen”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023.
^ “Jay-Z’s Delaware producer stimulates argument over AI rights”. Archived from the initial on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ “10 “Best” AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI”. October 19, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). “Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). “Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text”. cnet.com. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). “UniPi: Learning universal policies through text-guided video generation”. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the original on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control”. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). “10 Best Expert System (AI) 3D Generators”. eWEEK. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “Slash CAD design build times with new AI-driven part creation approach|GlobalSpec”. Archived from the initial on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the CAD Industry”. March 22, 2023. Archived from the initial on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). “GitHub has a vision to make code more safe and secure by style”. Axios Codebook. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). “Text-to-video AI inches closer as start-up Runway reveals brand-new model”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though present output is simple. Runway says it’ll be making its new generative video design, Gen-2, readily available to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). “Microsoft adds OpenAI technology to Word and Excel”. CNBC. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative synthetic intelligence technologies such as the popular ChatGPT chatting app to its Microsoft 365 suite of business software … the new A.I. features, called Copilot, will be offered in a few of the business’s most popular business apps, including Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). “The app’s Memories function simply got a huge upgrade”. TechRadar. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting a revamped, AI-powered Memories feature … you’ll be able to utilize generative AI to come up with some recommended names like “a desert experience”.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). “Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop”. MediaPost. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative synthetic intelligence (AI) will turn into one of the most essential features for innovative designers and online marketers. Adobe on Tuesday revealed a Generative Fill feature in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI capabilities into style.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). “LLaMA 2: How to gain access to and use Meta’s versatile open-source chatbot today”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you wish to run LLaMA 2 by yourself device or customize the code, you can download it directly from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI designs.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). “How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can develop a ChatGPT-like server based upon LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). “”Draw Things” App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone”. The Decoder. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are produced in your area, so you do not require a Web connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). “Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model in your home (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA model in the house, you will require a computer construct with a powerful GPU that can deal with the large quantity of information and calculation needed for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). “Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot”. Ziff Davis. Archived from the initial on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). “I basically only trust 2 LLM evals right now” (Tweet) – by means of Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). “Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …” (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). “Open source platforms * increase * safety and security” (Tweet) – by means of Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). “U.S. officials order Nvidia to stop sales of leading AI chips to China”. Reuters. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). “Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 operates at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while adhering to strict U.S. export requirements that restrict just how much processing power Nvidia can sell.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). “How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ “5 complimentary software application to recognise fake AI-generated images” (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ “Detecting AI fingerprints: A guide to watermarking and beyond”. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). “We evaluated a brand-new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent trainee”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). “Detecting AI may be impossible. That’s a big issue for instructors”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). “OpenAI, Google, others promise to watermark AI content for safety, White House states”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023.
^ “FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Expert System”. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). “3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “EU AI Act: first guideline on artificial intelligence”. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). “EU legislators vote for harder AI rules as draft transfer to final stage”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). “China says generative AI guidelines to apply only to products for the public”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法”. July 13, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b “Generative Expert system and Copyright Law”. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the original on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). “We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). “The New york city Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft for utilizing its stories to train chatbots”. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the initial on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). “Photo huge Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s likewise embracing the innovation”. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). “The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Getting Going”. Wired. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). “New York Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement”. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). “AI-generated art can not get copyrights, US court states”. Reuters. Archived from the original on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). “US Copyright Office wishes to hear what people consider AI and copyright”. The Verge. Archived from the original on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Artificial Intelligence”. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ “The Writers Strike Is Deciding on AI”. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). “Lessons from Eliza”. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). “AI is already taking video game illustrators’ jobs in China”. Rest of World. Archived from the initial on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). “China’s video game art industry reportedly annihilated by growing AI utilize”. Game Developer. Archived from the original on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). “Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging use of sophisticated tech”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has actually joined the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in requiring a contract that clearly requires AI policies to protect writers and the works they create. … The future of generative artificial intelligence in Hollywood-and how it can be utilized to replace labor-has become an important sticking point for actors going on strike. In a press conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more typically known as SAG-AFTRA), declared that ‘synthetic intelligence presents an existential danger to creative occupations, and all stars and entertainers are worthy of contract language that protects them from having their identity and talent made use of without approval and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). “ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools introduce out of beta”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. “‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods”. Forbes. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). “Underrepresented groups in countries all over the world are fretted about AI being a hazard to tasks”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). “Large language models are biased. Can reasoning assist conserve them?”. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the initial on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). “Reducing bias and improving safety in DALL · E 2”. OpenAI. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). “No fast fix: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 highlighted the difficulties of predisposition in AI”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ “DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations”. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). “Terrifying state-of-the-art porn: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the rise”. Fox News. Archived from the initial on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). “We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now”. Vice. Archived from the original on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ “What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying”. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the initial on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ “Experts fear face swapping tech might start a global showdown”. The Outline. Archived from the original on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). “Here Come the Fake Videos, Too”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). “Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting”. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). “Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Artificial Intelligence Vigilance”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the original on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). “U.S. braces for foreign interference in 2024 election”. Semafor. Archived from the initial on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). “Russia, Iran utilize AI to increase anti-U.S. influence projects, authorities say”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ “Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)”. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the original on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). “H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019”. www.congress.gov. Archived from the initial on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ “New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections”. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the original on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). “Disinformation wars: The battle versus fake news in the age of AI”. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). “Navigating the challenges of generative innovations: Proposing the combination of synthetic intelligence and blockchain”. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ “People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips”. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “The generative A.I. software race has begun”. Fortune. Archived from the original on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). “Elections in UK and US at threat from AI-driven disinformation, state experts”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “Seeing is believing? Global scramble to deal with deepfakes”. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the initial on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). “4chan users accept AI voice clone tool to create star hatespeech”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). “Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “A new AI voice tool is currently being abused to make deepfake celebrity audio clips”. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). “Even If AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good”. Wanderer. Archived from the initial on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). “AI songs that imitate popular artists raising alarms in the music market”. ABC News. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. “Fans Are Using Expert System to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs”. Complex. Archived from the initial on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. “Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). “Warner Music signs first-ever record handle AI pop star”. New York City Post. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). “Deepfakes: Get prepared for phishing 2.0”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. “As social media platforms brace for the incoming wave of deepfakes, Google’s previous ‘fraud czar’ predicts the most significant risk is that deepfakes will ultimately end up being boring”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). “Fake reviews: can we trust what we read online as use of AI explodes?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ “After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data”. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). “Should we make our most effective AI designs open source to all?”. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. New York Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York City, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d “AI is an energy hog. This is what it means for climate change”. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). “The carbon effect of synthetic intelligence”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). “Generative AI’s environmental expenses are soaring – and mostly secret”. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the initial on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. “AI’s Energy Demands Run out Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). “Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer scientist discusses the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins”. The Conversation. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). “Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). “First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We have actually Got ‘Slop'”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b “Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook”. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). “The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop”. The Atlantic. Archived from the initial on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). “Research AI model suddenly attempts to modify its own code to extend runtime”. Ars Technica. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). “Spam, scrap … slop? The most recent wave of AI behind the ‘zombie web'”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). “Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop”. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the original on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). “A Shocking Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). “A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine”. VICE. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). “Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has actually constantly been spam on the internet and in the datasets that Wordfreq used, “it was manageable and frequently identifiable. Large language designs create text that masquerades as genuine language with intent behind it, even though there is none, and their output turn up everywhere,” she composed. She gives the example that ChatGPT overuses the word “dive,” in a manner that individuals do not, which has thrown off the frequency of this particular word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). “ChatGPT “contamination”: estimating the occurrence of LLMs in the academic literature”. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). “Just How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?”. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). “AI Image Statistics for 2024: How Much Content Was Created by AI”. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). “AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated data”. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). “When A.I.’s Output Is a Hazard to A.I. Itself”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Self-Consuming Generative Models Go Mad”. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). “Synthetic Data for Better Artificial Intelligence”. databricks.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). “Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data”. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). “Evaluating an Artificial Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion”. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). “CNET found errors in over half of its AI-written stories”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ “A publication touted Michael Schumacher’s very first interview in years. It was really AI”. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the original on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). “Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is “Entirely” Comprised”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘writes fiction’ utilizing AI”. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). “Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). “Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). “B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Phony Person”. PetaPixel. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). “USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). “Dispatch pauses AI sports composing program”. Axios. Archived from the initial on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). “Mysterious bylines appeared on an U.S.A. Today site. Did these writers exist?”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab air conditioner “Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry”. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). “How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business”. CNN. Archived from the original on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). “News Corp using AI to produce 3,000 Australian regional newspaper article a week”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). “Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Move to AI Content”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). “Coming to your web, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories”. Vox. Archived from the initial on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). “The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). “Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based Upon Other AI Slop, Along With Warning They May Be Filled With Errors”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). “Irish Times apologises for hoax AI article about women’s use of fake tan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). “CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). “BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “Newsweek is making generative AI a component in its newsroom”. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “What’s in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated regional news, everything – and nothing”. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for conventional publishers?”. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). “A nationwide network of local news sites is publishing AI-written short articles under phony bylines. Experts are raising alarm”. CNN. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “Wyoming press reporter caught using expert system to develop phony quotes and stories”. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Cosmos Magazine publishes AI-generated short articles, drawing criticism from reporters, co-founders”. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI-generated articles are penetrating major news publications”. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the original on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). “Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans”. Wired. Archived from the original on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Apple states it will update AI feature after unreliable news alerts”. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the initial on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ “TV channels are utilizing AI-generated speakers to read the news. The question is, will we trust them?”. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). “‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). “World’s first AI news anchor unveiled in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “These ISIS news anchors are AI phonies. Their propaganda is real”. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). “Google Tests A.I. Tool That Is Able to Write News Articles”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). “Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform”. Adweek. Archived from the original on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). “Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). “How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Became an AI Clickbait Farm”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). “A Precious Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). “Early Apple tech bloggers are shocked to find their name and work have been AI-zombified”. The Verge. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI slop is currently invading Oregon’s local journalism”. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). “How a Little Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). “We Need Your Email Address”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ “Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket”. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the original on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). “Senators caution AI might lead to ‘damage’ of regional news”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. from the original on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus local news offer”. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). “Meta ignored news. Now the business’s using it for AI material”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools”. Wired. Archived from the initial on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). “Standards around generative AI”. Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). “The Guardian’s approach to generative AI”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). “Policies in parallel? A comparative research study of journalistic AI policies in 52 worldwide news organisations”. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). “Digital News Report 2024” (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.